We've got a cover!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26881/26881fcec3d3dfd2c6fc0deac1253c9b6dd49b0a" alt=""
We've also gotten some feedback on the finished book from people Jillian and I respect and it's good. It was kind of exactly what we'd hoped for. We'll share when we can.
Also, I realized it was selfish of me not to do the proper bloggy thing: I must share my favorite Kiehl's products from Jillian's birthday gift, because they're amazing. I can't handle most scents and my skin is getting dryer each year as I get [cough] older. Last winter, it HURT, even with the moisturizers and gentle cleansers [like SpectroJel] I was using.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73f4f/73f4f03f87d4527c437a682b766e9e4d57f35ea4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4f34/f4f34ef9f131378b70160889f33122602042ede0" alt=""
Also big love for the Ultra facial moisturizer which goes on smooth and light and works really well on my dry face. And the adorably named Unusually Rich-But Not Greasy At All-Hand Cream with SPF 10 which is just what it says. Good for hands that need to be smooth to spin silk.
Concern: the original Kiehl's logo is properly typeset [and quite pretty!], which goes with a company whose heritage traces back to the 1800s.
But the current label? There's a freaking foot mark where the apostrophe should be. This is a very cool company. Why couldn't they get this tiny but important detail correct? Or is it an intentional kitsch detail? Would love to know.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4420/f44207446df66b521f6c649c07192b0c891ba02e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15b22/15b2224c8574bffff0e3ce2f74c6aec35b759c1e" alt=""